Peer Review: BlogPost #7

Above is the title of my PowerPoint presentation. However, below is a peer review of others in compare/contrast.



Day 1: Endangered Species

> What Works: This particular presentation about endangered species around the world, and how the human race has a major impact on the declining of some animals does a great job providing definition, facts, and and statistical data as supporting evidence of her key points

>What Does Not Work: Although the writer uses several statistics as evidence for her topic, there seems to be an over exposure to statistics rather than focusing on each individual point.

>Improvement  Needed: The writer needs to focus on ways to clarify her claim/thesis statement.


Day 2: Rap is Controversial

> What Works: In this presentation, the writer implements a unique sense of style and maintains organization of the three key-focus points of the topic.

> What Does Not Work: Thesis statement that the writer uses does not explicitly state his position in reference to the topic.

> Improvement Needed: The research question that the writer developed needs to coordinate with the claim/thesis statement.


My Presentation: Marriage: Positive Consequences vs. Negative Consequences

Good News: I was consistent in organization of the 3 key focus points, of my topic and successfully developed a research question that coordinates with my thesis/claim. I also made effort to include a works cited.

Bad News: Although i included a works cited page, the information provided does not provide any facts or statistics as strong evidence to support the 3 keys points. Also the font size and style were not consistent.

Sources Referenced: Research Proposal Presentations, March 27-29 2018
                                    Image: Adobe Fireworks CC 2015




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"College is a Waste of Time"

Critical Response: Blogpost #4

About Me